A literary text written for this website using sourced mythological motifs and historical information. Its imagery and transitions are original; it is not a verbatim translation of an ancient epic. The Nart world is distinguished from the historical reality of 1864.
Imagine evening at the foot of the Caucasus mountains. The last light withdraws from the summits; distance becomes a blue silence. Now imagine a voice opening that silence. A child listening begins to discover roads not yet seen. We enter a world where stone, fire, forest and the human heart can speak another language. This is the world of the Nart Legend. Crossing its threshold, the first thing we inherit is not a hero’s sword, but a word still being spoken.
The Narts are the heroes of an epic world that Circassians have carried through speech, verse and song. This inheritance cannot fit into a single author’s finished book; other Caucasian peoples have their own Nart traditions too. Here, that many-voiced heritage opens a door into Circassian mythology. We hear a familiar name and meet a different detail: the paths of memory separate like branches of a river, draw close again and continue along their own beds.[1]
In that world, Setenay’s wisdom reaches Tlepsh’s smithy. In Sosruko’s extraordinary birth, hot stone is split and a hero emerges through the smith’s work. Shible evokes thunder, Thagalej abundance, Mezitha the forest and the hunt. Life is made beyond the battlefield too: the sickle, associated with Setenay’s counsel, belongs in the epic. The labour that gives us bread earns a place beside heroic courage.[2]
In another tale, Sosruko’s path leads to bringing fire. That title, preserved today in an Adyghe literature textbook, invites us back towards the first light. Thinking of fire, we may picture more than a shining flame: people able to see one another’s faces in the dark. In this page’s imagery, fire is warmth enlarged by sharing. Listening to the legend, we turn its question towards ourselves: might strength be revealed in how we carry what we possess into the lives of others?[7]
The path of speech eventually meets the path of writing. Nineteenth-century collectors such as Shora Nogmov and Khan-Giray, followed later by projects including Asker Hadeghatle’s seven-volume collection, helped record this inheritance. Narrators in the Caucasus and diaspora contributed their memories. Setting a voice in letters does not preserve everything: the reader must look again for the pause, the glance, the feeling a melody leaves in a room. Yet whenever the page opens, another small door remains open against forgetting.[8]
Along this path, however, the time of legend must part from historical time. The year 1864 marks the mass expulsion of Circassians from their homeland by the Russian Empire. This is no catastrophe within an epic: it is destruction endured by real people. Historian Walter Richmond examines the process as genocide. Here we speak of vulnerable human lives facing violence and dispossession, rather than the extraordinary powers of heroes.[3]
Imagine having to build a life across the sea. Never crossing the threshold left behind; speaking the name of a place without being able to point out a road back to it. The historical section below also records losses through estimates. But a number cannot stand in for a face. So we pause here, for someone’s mother, someone’s child, someone with whom another hoped to grow old. Remembering means refusing to treat those lives as expendable to memory.
Far from home, memory takes new forms. Madina Pashtova’s research in Uzunyayla describes changing mythological narration: oral performance of the Nart epic declined while other everyday beliefs and accounts persisted. This is evidence from a particular setting, not one portrait of the entire diaspora. Still, it leaves us a question: does keeping an inheritance alive mean preserving it without change, or making room for its voice to be heard within a changing life?[6]
Reaching the present, we do not look for that room only on bookshelves. Research into music among the Yeleme Circassians examines the connection between cultural identity, melody and oral transmission, including the Narts in songs and narratives. Listening becomes one way of attending to the past. Even when we do not understand everything at first, curiosity can call us back: whose name was that? Where did this melody come from? Who listened before us, and who will listen after?[9]
The Nart Legend stands beside these questions today: a presence from a distant age, and an invitation to learn and remember. We answer when we try again to pronounce a name, ask about an unfamiliar word or listen carefully to an elder’s account. The mountains may remain just as far away, yet the silence between us changes. Even after this page closes, may a question, a name or a small light travel with you. The next telling can begin there.
A short timeline
A few landmarks, keeping the time of legend distinct from historical events.
Legends pass through speech, verse and song; no single year of origin is assigned.[1]
Written collecting develops through figures such as Shora Nogmov and Khan-Giray.[8]
The symbolic end of the war becomes a date for commemorating exile and loss.[4]
Oral heritage in the Caucasus and diaspora contributes to extensive collections.[8]
Pashtova’s study of the diaspora in Turkey examines the preservation and transformation of mythological memory.[6]
Düzce University presents Adyghe mythological and Nart texts in a literature textbook.[7]
1864: exile and loss
Behind the numbers are people.
The publisher’s summary of Richmond’s book gives this lower bound for deaths from massacre, starvation and exposure. It is not a count of deaths during the sea crossing alone.[3]
Sunata’s review of the literature cites this estimate for people forced from their homeland. It also reports an estimate that at least one third of the migrants died in transit and in places of exile.[4]
These figures are estimates, not complete counts. Sources differ in the periods and categories of loss they cover. The figures should not be added together or treated as measurements of an identical event.
Every number stands for a life, a family and a home left behind. Remembrance means keeping those people visible beyond the statistics.
Sources and reading notes
The sources below support the mythological motifs, collection history and historical information. Literary imagery was written for this website; it is not a verbatim translation of these publications.
- John Colarusso (2002). Nart Sagas from the Caucasus: Myths and Legends from the Circassians, Abazas, Abkhaz, and UbykhsPrinceton University Press · Introduction, pp. 1–8.
Academic source in English. The linked introduction, not the entire book, was consulted for context.
- Şenol Zaman (2024). Çerkes Nart Destanları’nın Neliği, Nasıllığı ve Neredenliği Bağlamında George Dumézil’in Üç İşlev Hipotezi / ŞablonuUluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 13(2), 533–559. Sosruko / Sosrıkua: p. 544.
Academic article in Turkish. Used for principal figures and motifs of everyday life, especially pp. 535, 543–544.
- Walter Richmond (2013). The Circassian GenocideRutgers University Press · ISBN 9780813560670. Publisher’s description / Yayınevi özeti.
Publisher’s description of a historical study in English. Source for the overall loss estimate; not the complete book.
- Ulaş Sunata (2021). The Construction of Turkey’s Circassians as a Docile MinorityPoligrafi, 26(101/102), 235–260; pp. 240–241. DOI: 10.35469/poligrafi.2021.276.
Academic article in English. Used for 1864, diaspora and estimates discussed in the literature.
- Circassian National Assembly (2026). April 25 — Circassian Flag DayFlag design: 12 stars, 3 arrows / Bayrak düzeni: 12 yıldız, 3 ok.
Reference for the flag’s stars and arrows.
- Madina Pashtova (2015). Мифологический нарратив в черкесской диаспоре: сохранность, семантико-прагматический аспектJournal of Caucasian Studies / Kafkasya Çalışmaları, 1(1), 159–181. DOI: 10.21488/jocas.70023.
Academic article in Russian, with Turkish and English abstracts. Used for mythological memory in the diaspora in Turkey.
- Prof. Dr. Mira Haçemizova (2025). Çerkez (Adıge) Edebiyatı – I / АДЫГЭ ЛИТЕРАТУРЭР -IDüzce Üniversitesi Yayınları 60. Editör: Dr. Memduh Ceylan. ISBN 978-625-6330-09-2. Önsöz / Preface: s. 8; mitoloji / mythology: s. 11–16; Nart: s. 17–73.
University publication. Used for the scope of mythology and the Nart epic, educational transmission and Adyghe reading.
- Amjad M. Jaimoukha. An Introductory Account of Circassian LiteratureThe Nart Epos / Collection, pp. 3–6. PDF publication date unspecified / PDF’de yayın tarihi belirtilmemiş.
English-language account. Used for collection history, without adopting contested claims about origins or dating.
- Alev Türkan & Sibel Paşaoğlu (2025). Migration, Diaspora and Music: Musical Identity among Yeleme CircassiansYegah Musicology Journal, 8(4), 2682–2716. Özellikle / especially p. 2691. DOI: 10.51576/ymd.1786199.
Academic article in English. Music, oral transmission and cultural identity in the Yeleme case study.